Rob Farley opines at World Press Review on the political/strategic implications of War Diarii:
Perversely, efforts to increase government transparency often have negative effect on actual secrecy policy. For example, the ability of individuals to uncover written notes from government meetings through FOIA requests or through lawsuit discovery has led to the practice of shredding notes following most meetings. Data that does not exist cannot be leaked. We can similarly expect in the future that incident reports of the type leaked to Wikileaks will become less available to potential leakers. The U.S. military collects and correlates this data in order to improve tactical effectiveness. Information about particularly effective methods, about failure, and about enemy capability spreads across units with access to the data. Because of concerns over adverse political effects, however, the military will probably collect less data, destroy more, and further limit access to what data remains.
It all sounds pretty dire, but then again Rob may just be grumpy because of this.
OK, seriously. Read the whole thing here.
Farley's argument seems a bit odd in light of the fact that Ellsberg's Pentagon Papers were released almost 40 years ago…
Excellent point, Vikash. Â It's all too easy to forget too that Congress can and should pass laws requiring military record-keeping–and disclosure. Â Last i checked, the military still was under civilian control in this country–at least since Obama fired McChrystal.Â