So, this is it — Tunisia is vindication of the Iraq War. Here’s Jennifer Rubin’s great insight:
Recall when President George W. Bush talked about democracy taking hold in Iraq and then the region? Now Bush’s vision seems very prescient.
…One question that deserves further consideration: How much did the emergence of a democratic Iraq have to do with this popular revolt in Tunisia?
This is similar to a point Max Boot made recently at Amherst College in a debate with Andrew Bacevich. Boot argued that it was too early to tell if the Iraq war was a success or failure, because as he put it, the effects possibly might not be known for decades. (Bacevich countered by noting that, given Boot’s logic, with the economic developments and recent steps toward political liberalization in Vietnam, perhaps we will soon be on the verge of being able to call the Vietnam War a success.)
The arguments of Rubin and Boot remind me of the hot summer when I was a kid growing up in western North Dakota and our well went dry. Rather than spend money on “big city” hydrogeologists, my dad decided to use the ancient dowsing method of willow-witching to look for water. Each morning, he picked up his willow branches and walked around until he found the “right spot.” My brother and I then dutifully dug and drilled holes — that turned up dry — day after day. But alas, nearly seven weeks and some three dozen dry holes later, we finally hit water and tapped a new well. For the past forty years, my dad has told all who will listen about the wonders of willow witching and how he found water that summer.
Yep, keep searching and you’re bound to find something….
Thanks. That anybody could make such arguments in respected media and be taken seriously is funny, by which I mean terrifying and depressing.
As a point of trivia, this is the logical problem with all teleological arguments that refuse to make point predictions (e.g. Wendt's “Why a World State is Inevitable” piece). Their fruition is always just over the horizon.
Good post. Jennifer Rubin's “insight” is complete nonsense. Here's a hypothetical test, for those social scientists out there who think there might be something in it: ask any protestor in the streets of Tunis whether they were thinking about the emergence of 'democracy' in Iraq. If a single one answers yes, I'd be quite shocked.
Adam Serwer, also at WaPo, has a good analysis on the tactics behind Jennifer Rubin's “insight” : “It's painfully simplistic, but simplicity often makes for attractive political narratives. The one being set up here is simple: If Tunisia succeeds in transitioning peacefully to a democratic state, the credit is due entirely to Bush for invading Iraq. If it does not, it is because Obama failed to 'get on the right side of history.'“
Vietnam War a success? No, but that witch burning is finally paying off in the resurgence of Christianity in America.