Sylvester productively draws out the implications of the current ‘camp’ structure of IR: on the one hand, the proliferation of ‘camps’ and communities within IR increases the opportunities for publication and advancement for those whose work does not conform to traditional disciplinary norms; on the other hand, the emergence of camps with their own journals, books series, ISA/BISA sections and common citations productive dialogue across and between camps is difficult if not impossible. Sylvester also usefully points out that the camp system can end up with arrogant competitions within camps...
Symposium — Response to Christine Sylvester, “Experiencing the End of IR Theory/End of War”
read more